What did Nash see?

May 19, 2008 10:27 PM by Andrew / 8 Comments / Trackback

When I never heard back from Jack Nash, I assumed it was because he was too busy to bother answering me. But I also realized that I haven’t seen or heard anything about him since then, and he’s not the type to just stop in the middle of an investigation, which has had me wondering if he might have seen more than he was supposed to.

I guess Frohz3n has been wondering the same thing, because he just sent me an email explaining that he has been monitoring transmissions from Nash’s cell phone since his first report about the Utah National Guard.

That’s how he ended up hearing this:

According to Frohz3n, that’s the last call that Nash made on his phone… and while I’m not sure exactly when he made it, Frohz3n implied that it was at least a few days ago. It sounds like they took his phone, because the call disconnected just after he addressed someone - General Michaelson, I think? - by name.

Amazingly, there’s more. Nash also used his phone to send a series of digital photos just before he made that call, which Frohz3n was also able to intercept:

(view larger)

Nash was onto something, I’m sure of it. And the photos seem to prove that there was an unexpected attack on one of the military installations outside of Piedmont. But if the military is there to help contain whatever happened - and I’m almost certain they are - then what reason would anyone have to attack them?

This still makes no sense.

Tags: nash

Comments on “What did Nash see?”

Piedmont, UT
location, location, location.
if each person involved in piedmont and iraq had a last known location trace it.
patterns are usually the greatest source to find or discover something.

this could be religous or it could be outer worldly.

BlueAlphaJ02 on May 24th, 2008 at 11:06 am

Yeah, stockade of what, though? What the staockade is of could be much more important that the fact that they even had a stockade at all. If there’s anyway to find out what it is, then that needs to be done. That could be the difference, and could let us know exactly what the hell is going on over there. I have a buddy, who we call “Punk” who lives out that way. He was a recon man in the Green Berets until he got injured and honorably discharged. Let me holler at him and see if he can do his thing, and maybe relay a little inside info.

But this in itself brings up a VERY interesting point. If everyone is communicating online like this, don’t you think that the government can log on and see exactly what we have to say. What we may or may not have planned? The more I look at everyone’s posts, and check out the video and audio that Toby has produced, the more I start to think that this may be just a little bit bigger than what we may have all initially thought. I think that we may need a little help, of a slightly larger caliber.

ENIGMA on May 22nd, 2008 at 8:42 am

Yeah.
They do say stockade.
But why would they need that?

Carl on May 21st, 2008 at 11:10 am

it seems that this biological agent either kills near-instantly upon exposure, or causes some extreme form of psychosis in rare cases. In the initial answering machine message, there was more speculation that the screams stemmed from fear of attack/imminenet life threat than visual horror from just seeing someone (witha pre-existing condition) slump over…’the general’ survived - for a bit. Any new info on your uncle? so far, he seemed like the only sane survivor, crawling and hiding near a humvee instead of the aggressive behaviors displayed by others.
it is looking more and more like the military was overconfident in it’s ability to contain this, and the poor soldiers there are running strong risks of being infected themselves…how long before this makes it to a major metropolitan area?

realiTbender on May 21st, 2008 at 1:10 am

Older →

What did Nash see?

Comments on “What did Nash see?”

Pages

What's Going On?

Links

Updates

Recent Posts

Tags